false
OasisLMS
Catalog
Read With the Experts: 4 High-Yield Cases with Tea ...
Lesson 9.1 - PET Cases (PET vs SPECT)
Lesson 9.1 - PET Cases (PET vs SPECT)
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
A patient with BMI 35 and creatinine 2.5 underwent a cardiac evaluation revealing severe coronary artery calcium (CAC) and slight drops in ejection fraction (EF) during stress tests. Initial SPECT imaging was inconclusive due to diaphragmatic attenuation. A cardiac PET scan subsequently indicated mild to moderate ischemia, prompting coronary catheterization which identified critical stenosis. PET offers superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy over SPECT due to higher resolution, robust attenuation correction, and reduced radiation dose. PET also provides comprehensive risk assessment through a combination of perfusion imaging, stress EF, coronary calcium scoring, and myocardial flow reserve evaluation.
Keywords
cardiac PET
coronary catheterization
ischemia
ejection fraction
myocardial flow reserve
×
Please select your language
1
English